Language legislation in the era of independence: sociolinguistic dimension
Abstract
The objective of the paper is to examine the sociolinguistic dimension of language legislation in Ukraine. The study focuses on the impact of the “language issue” on Ukrainian society in the context of war as well as to analyse linguistic representations, ideologies, and attitudes and their impact on the linguistic behaviour of Ukrainians. A resource for activating interpersonal solidarity and resistance to the enemy, and for modulating the manifestation of individual positions in macrosociological and political relations that may arise in the process of interaction. With the help of a critical approach to the theoretical guidelines of the study the role of language legislation in shaping language policy and regulating the use of languages in various spheres of life is analysed. The issues of linguistic equality, diglossia, and language policy in relation to minority languages are considered. The most important issue of the paper is that the language legislation of the independence era in Ukraine is of great importance for the sociolinguistic development of society. In times of war, it affects language processes, language policy, and the total transition to the state language.
Excluding the language of the enemy, however, does not mean levelling all languages. It is important to strike a balance between protecting the language rights of citizens and preserving linguistic diversity in the country.
Downloads
References
Bilaniuk, L. (2022). The Trajectory of Language Laws in Ukraine: Inclusions and Omissions in Naming and Categorization since 1989. Acta Slavica Iaponica, 43, 49-70. https://acortar.link/HHShaN
Buriak, I., Skaletska, Z., Rezvorovych, K., & Gigin, O. (2023). Future legal culture as an element of the legal system. Futurity Economics&Law, 3(2), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2023.06.25.03
Chapman, E. (2022). Revocalising human geography: Decolonial language geographies beyond the nation-state. Progress in Human Geography, 47(1), 24-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325221131852
De Saussure, L., & Wharton, T. (2020). Relevance, effects, and affect. International Review of Pragmatics, 12(2), 183-205. https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01202001
Filipova, M., Iliev, K., & Yuleva-Chuchulayn, R. (2021). A Transhumanist Legal Worldview: Responding to the Challenges of Time (Requirement, or Necessity?). Futurity Economics&Law, 1(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2021.03.25.5
Fishman, J. A. (2020). Who speaks what language to whom and when? In The bilingualism reader (pp. 55-70). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2018-0034
García, O. (2022). 18 A Sociolinguistic Biography and Understandings of Bilingualism. Multilingualism and Education: Researchers' Pathways and Perspectives, 150. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009037075.018
Gnatiuk, O., & Melnychuk, A. (2019). Identities with historical regions–are they adapting to modern administrative division? The case of Ukraine. European Spatial Research and Policy, 26(1), 175-194. https://acortar.link/htM9up
Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 1(2), 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672899800025X
Holmes, J., & Wilson, N. (2022). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367821852
Jaspers, J. (2023). Interactional sociolinguistics and discourse analysis. In The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 85-97). Routledge. https://acortar.link/sEKPUN
Kelly, G. J. (2023). Qualitative Research as Culture and Practice. Handbook of Research on Science Education, 60-86. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367855758-4
Khoa, B. T., Hung, B. P., & Hejsalem-Brahmi, M. (2023). Qualitative research in social sciences: data collection, data analysis and report writing. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 12(1-2), 187-209. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPSPM.2023.132247
Kulyk, V. (2018). Shedding Russianness, recasting Ukrainianness: The post-Euromaidan dynamics of ethnonational identifications in Ukraine. Post-Soviet Affairs, 34(2-3), 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2018.1451232
Kumar, A. (2021). Analysis of the Principle of Subsidiarity as a Principle of EU Law: Future Perspectives. Futurity Economics&Law, 1(4), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2021.12.25.03
Kusters, A., & Lucas, C. (2022). Emergence and evolutions: Introducing sign language sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 26(1), 84-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12522
Onuch, O., Hale, H. E., & Sasse, G. (2018). Studying identity in Ukraine. Post-Soviet Affairs, 34(2-3), 79-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2018.1451241
Pratt, T. (2023). Affect in sociolinguistic style. Language in Society, 52(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404521000774
Rodriguez-Ordoñez, I., Kasstan, J., & O’Rourke, B. (2022). Responding to sociolinguistic change: New speakers and variationist sociolinguistics. International Journal of Bilingualism, 26(5), 529-541. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069221110381
Saussure, F. D., & De Mauro, T. (2020). General linguistics course. University of Calabria. https://hdl.handle.net/10955/3975
Shevchuk, L. (2021). Environmental rights of citizens and legal safeguards for their protection: challenges for the future. Futurity Economics&Law, 1(2), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2021.06.25.1
Shutenko, S. V. (2022). The language situation in Ukraine. Ukrainian language in jurisprudence: state, problems, Prospects: materials of the XVIII All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conf. (Kyiv, November 17, 2022). Kyiv: National Academy of Internal Affairs. https://acortar.link/s0VJQ5
Siregar, I. (2022). Criticism of Philosophical Approaches to Sociolinguistics. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(1), 5267-5275. https://acortar.link/pp4jtZ
Stich, S. U. (2020). On communication compression for distributed optimization on heterogeneous data. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.02388
Tiv, M., Kutlu, E., O'Regan, E., & Titone, D. (2022). Bridging people and perspectives: General and language-specific social network structure predict mentalizing across diverse sociolinguistic contexts. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76(4), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000273
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2023). Home page. https://www.rada.gov.ua/en
Copyright (c) 2023 Amazonia Investiga

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.